
CC licensed by Flickr
"The study, in which we collaborated and contributed data, was carried out by KTH," explains Erik Larsson, environmental manager at Bonnierförlagen, which, together with Adlibris and Elib, represented Bonnier in the study. "Similar studies have been conducted for magazines, but we wanted to focus on books. And KTH, as an independent research institute, felt like the most appropriate partner."
The study was carried out by the Center for Sustainable Communications at KTH. Its aim was to compare the environmental impact of printed books and e-books. The basis for calculation was a so-called simplified Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), a method for measuring the potential environmental impact and resource consumption throughout a product's life cycle, from raw material extraction to production, use and disposal.
Producing a book from start to finish is a lengthy process. First timber is cut and shipped to a paper mill, where it is then turned into paper pulp. Then there is transport and distribution to the retailer, which could be either a physical or online bookstore.
One particularly interesting finding in the study is that the most significant environmental impact is caused by the manufacture of e-readers. This means that the more books you read on an e-reader, the less each book affects the environment.
"In order for an e-reader to pay off in terms of its effect on the climate, you would need to read at least 33 e-books during the product's estimated two-year life cycle, according to the study," says Merete Lind, production manager at Bonnier Publications. "This may sound like a lot, but the assumption is that those with an e-reader read more than the average consumer."
The study also compared the environmental effects of traditional and wood-free paper. Wood-free paper contains little or no lignin, or wood pulp, which otherwise causes paper to yellow over time. Wood pulp is removed chemically. In this case, however, a clear winner was hard to find.
"Considering all the data that I've gathered together with colleagues, it's clear that the question of environmental impact is complex and that simple answers aren't as available as one often hopes," says Merete.
"The study is of course interesting for us, because consumers will demand greater environmental responsibility and better awareness from companies," explains Erik. "We constantly review production techniques, and if suppliers fail to meet our environmental standards, we'll find others to replace them."
How books affect the climate
Carbon dioxide equivalents (a measure of a product's net carbon emissions):
• A bound fiction book purchased in a physical bookshop: 1.3 kilos
• A bound fiction book purchased from an online retailer: 1.1 kilos
• An e-book purchased from an online retailer and viewed on an e-reader (if a total of 48 e-books are read): 0.87 kilos
Monthly archive
- May 2012 (10)
- April 2012 (8)
- March 2012 (24)
- February 2012 (14)
- January 2012 (12)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (23)
- October 2011 (22)
- September 2011 (20)
- August 2011 (15)
- July 2011 (14)
- June 2011 (16)
- May 2011 (30)
- April 2011 (27)
- March 2011 (31)
- February 2011 (22)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (15)
- November 2010 (17)
- October 2010 (17)
- September 2010 (21)
- August 2010 (15)
- July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (22)
- May 2010 (24)
- April 2010 (24)
- March 2010 (28)
- February 2010 (17)
- January 2010 (9)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (12)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (9)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (1)


Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Google
Technorati
Twitter
Comments
Hi, Very interesting to read. I have been contemplating about buying an E-reader but have been searching for an indication of product life span as this is a major contributing factor for products in an LCA. Lifespan of products in our "throw away" society has become ridiculous. Such is also the case with the E-reader in my opinion. A life span of 2 years is just too short. Especially since the concept of a book has remained the same over decades or longer. I would not want to buy a new E-reader every 2-3 years for any reason. So thanks for this research. I am gonna get one if the life span of such products is increased to 5-10 years. Until then I'll stick with the non electronic version.
John Alberts, January 10, 2010
Hi! Congratulations to a very interesting study! Still you can see that the old good book holds out as a very environmentaly friendly alternative. You need to use your wireless reading device a lot before it beats the book: Hardback with chemical paper: 33 times (66) Hardback with mechanical paper: 48 times (96) Paperback with mechanical paper: 60 times (120) No within brackets is if two persons read the same book. If you normally read paperback books you need to use your wireless reading device to read 30 books/year to beat the paper book.
Tommy Sundin, December 21, 2009
Post new comment